On 10/10/2016 22:02, Martin Storsjö wrote: > Would the benchmark numbers be more readable/usable if presented as > relative speedup vs the C version? That'd cut the number of rows > in half, and making it easier to spot outliers or areas needing > more tuning. > > The relative speedups for the functions above (plus the _hv variants) > are: > vp9_avg4_neon: 1.66 0.69 1.56 1.77
Yes, looks much better. While at it, I wonder if the A8 benchmark had some external factor to be a speed regression. _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list libav-devel@libav.org https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
