On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 10:29 AM, Luca Barbato <lu_z...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> The term checkasm is misleading. The whole thing is a unit-test for some
> specific dsp functions.
Not really, no. The checkasm tests only tests whether or not the
output of the assembly functions matches the output of the C function.
It doesn't try to verify that the C function is actually correct
With that said, I really don't see any point in disabling tests just
because there's currently no assembly implementation.
libav-devel mailing list