On Tue, 18 Oct 2016, Luca Barbato wrote:

The previous commit lacked this.

Looks like the hashes weren't updated...

tests/ref/fate/filter-pixfmts-scale | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tests/ref/fate/filter-pixfmts-scale 
index 97f29be..2a60f72 100644
--- a/tests/ref/fate/filter-pixfmts-scale
+++ b/tests/ref/fate/filter-pixfmts-scale
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ bgr8                e731ba3dbec294e1daa7313e08e88034
bgra                6e1f417ae41636f631de1cfe39ce1778
gbrap               eefdbfd1426765ce5e9790022533db0d
gbrap12be           af4acb3ad0a6630f6ec4534e4d2e869a
-gbrap12le           fb66da21243e922b4e12ca05d8242c42
+gbrap12le           90ca5271960dc1ebd6ebe14189223e36
gbrp                5d14768d2ab6cbf3879966b5d5c6befb
gbrp10be            4192c246f4a52ec7a37919665190cce9
gbrp10le            170189b2c2dd46f31165d8fa6cadef0a

This is at least the same hash that I'm getting on both x86_64, arm and aarch64 now, so I guess it's ok then. No idea if the code actually produces the right results though, but at least it's consistent now.

// Martin
libav-devel mailing list

Reply via email to