Hi,
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 4:46 PM, Martin Storsjö <mar...@martin.st> wrote:
> The dc-only mode is already checked to work correctly above, but this
> allows benchmarking this mode for performance tuning, and allows making
> sure that it actually is correctly hooked up.
> ---
> tests/checkasm/vp9dsp.c | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tests/checkasm/vp9dsp.c b/tests/checkasm/vp9dsp.c
> index 690e0cf..b9d1c73 100644
> --- a/tests/checkasm/vp9dsp.c
> +++ b/tests/checkasm/vp9dsp.c
> @@ -297,6 +297,12 @@ static void check_itxfm(void)
> }
> bench_new(dst, sz * SIZEOF_PIXEL, coef, sz * sz);
> }
> + if (txtp == 0 && tx != 4) {
> + if (check_func(dsp.itxfm_add[tx][txtp],
> "vp9_inv_%s_%dx%d_dc_add",
> + txtp_types[txtp], sz, sz)) {
> + bench_new(dst, sz * SIZEOF_PIXEL, coef, 1);
> + }
> + }
> }
> }
> report("itxfm");
> --
> 2.7.4
I had a different local modification that allows tuning all the relevant
sub-IDCTs, basically re-arranging the loops so check_func is inside the
sub-IDCT loop and we bench each sub-IDCT separately. That's more generic
and probably more useful.
Ronald
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
libav-devel@libav.org
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
