Hi, On Dec 12, 2016 11:30, "Vittorio Giovara" <[email protected]> wrote:
On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 4:07 PM, Vittorio Giovara <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 5:15 PM, Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> wrote: >> There was this idea of a single version number for all libraries. >> Maybe it's time to revisit it? > > I'm not against it, this is probably a good time to discuss it. Any other opinion about this point? Should we unify the target to the highest one? Should we wait until next release? -- Vittorio _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel I'm just curious about what behaviour this is intended to promote or discourage from our downstream. I have doubts it would be effective. Don't misconstrue my comment with rejection of the patch(es) though. Maybe having identical numbers across libraries just looks cooler. ----- Sean McGovern - +1 613 862 6507 _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
