On Wed, 11 Jan 2017 10:18:04 +0100 Anton Khirnov <[email protected]> wrote:
> Quoting wm4 (2017-01-10 10:29:53) > > On Tue, 10 Jan 2017 09:01:09 +0100 > > Anton Khirnov <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > /** > > > - * width and height of the video frame > > > + * @name Video dimensions > > > + * Video frames only. The coded dimensions (in pixels) of the video > > > frame, > > > + * i.e. the size of the rectangle that contains some well-defined > > > values. > > > + * > > > + * @note The part of the frame intended for display/presentation is > > > further > > > + * restricted by the @ref cropping "Cropping rectangle". > > > + * @{ > > > */ > > > int width, height; > > > + /** > > > + * @} > > > + */ > > > > I also have to this is obviously wrong when applying automatic cropping > > (or one could say legacy cropping) to hw frames. Quite annoying in > > multiple ways. > > How is it wrong? They are not the actual real coded or allocated > dimensions, but that shouldn't matter all that much, no? > I mean the hw surface (which will be equivalent to the coded size) will have a different size in the "legacy" cropping case. _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
