On Wed, 25 Jan 2017, Luca Barbato wrote:
On 25/01/2017 09:29, Martin Storsjö wrote:
From: Carl Eugen Hoyos <[email protected]>
When bytes_read overflowed, last_bytes_read did not yet overflow
and no bytes-read report was created leading to a timeout.
Analyzed-by: Thomas Bernhard
---
libavformat/rtmpproto.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Not against it, but theoretically wouldn't the problem present itself
unchanged once you shove enough data in? (yes would take quite a bit of
time given the current network fabrics available).
Theoretically yes, but I'm quite ok with a solution that breaks after
sending/receiving 2^64 bytes.
// Martin
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
