Quoting Vittorio Giovara (2017-02-08 14:40:45)
> On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 5:50 AM, Anton Khirnov <[email protected]> wrote:
> > This will avoid every caller from hardcoding some specific alignment,
> > which may break in the future with new instruction sets.
> > ---
> >  doc/APIchanges      | 4 ++++
> >  libavutil/frame.c   | 4 ++++
> >  libavutil/frame.h   | 4 +++-
> >  libavutil/version.h | 2 +-
> >  4 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/doc/APIchanges b/doc/APIchanges
> > index acd1536..fd751f3 100644
> > --- a/doc/APIchanges
> > +++ b/doc/APIchanges
> > @@ -13,6 +13,10 @@ libavutil:     2015-08-28
> >
> >  API changes, most recent first:
> >
> > +2017-02-xx - xxxxxxx - lavu 55.31.1 - frame.h
> > +  Allow passing the value of 0 (meaning "automatic") as the required 
> > alignment
> > +  to av_frame_get_buffer().
> > +
> >  2017-02-xx - xxxxxxx - lavu 55.31.0 - cpu.h
> >    Add av_cpu_max_align() for querying maximum required data alignment.
> >
> > diff --git a/libavutil/frame.c b/libavutil/frame.c
> > index aafaa57..aa5820c 100644
> > --- a/libavutil/frame.c
> > +++ b/libavutil/frame.c
> > @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
> >  #include "channel_layout.h"
> >  #include "buffer.h"
> >  #include "common.h"
> > +#include "cpu.h"
> >  #include "dict.h"
> >  #include "frame.h"
> >  #include "imgutils.h"
> > @@ -103,6 +104,9 @@ static int get_video_buffer(AVFrame *frame, int align)
> >          if (ret < 0)
> >              return ret;
> >
> > +        if (align <= 0)
> > +            align = av_cpu_max_align();
> 
> should you maybe be stricter here and check for == 0, failing for negative?

More code for little gain IMO.

-- 
Anton Khirnov
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel

Reply via email to