On 02/10/2017 02:33 AM, Anton Khirnov wrote: > Quoting John Stebbins (2017-02-08 22:52:28) >> --- >> libavcodec/h264dec.c | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/libavcodec/h264dec.c b/libavcodec/h264dec.c >> index 5137039..6d7aa7b 100644 >> --- a/libavcodec/h264dec.c >> +++ b/libavcodec/h264dec.c >> @@ -452,7 +452,6 @@ void ff_h264_flush_change(H264Context *h) >> if (h->cur_pic_ptr) >> h->cur_pic_ptr->reference = 0; >> h->first_field = 0; >> - ff_h264_sei_uninit(&h->sei); >> h->recovery_frame = -1; >> h->frame_recovered = 0; >> } >> @@ -466,6 +465,7 @@ static void flush_dpb(AVCodecContext *avctx) >> memset(h->delayed_pic, 0, sizeof(h->delayed_pic)); >> >> ff_h264_flush_change(h); >> + ff_h264_sei_uninit(&h->sei); >> >> for (i = 0; i < H264_MAX_PICTURE_COUNT; i++) >> ff_h264_unref_picture(h, &h->DPB[i]); >> -- >> 2.9.3 > Looks good to me, but I'd appreciate Janne's opinion as well. >
Still waiting on feedback from Janne? -- John GnuPG fingerprint: D0EC B3DB C372 D1F1 0B01 83F0 49F1 D7B2 60D4 D0F7
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
