On Mon, 6 Mar 2017 09:37:13 +0100 Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 04, 2017 at 11:57:52PM +0000, Mark Thompson wrote: > > --- a/libavfilter/Makefile > > +++ b/libavfilter/Makefile > > @@ -77,6 +77,7 @@ OBJS-$(CONFIG_NULL_FILTER) += vf_null.o > > OBJS-$(CONFIG_OPENCL_PROGRAM_FILTER) += vf_opencl_program.o > > opencl.o > > OBJS-$(CONFIG_OVERLAY_FILTER) += vf_overlay.o > > +OBJS-$(CONFIG_OVERLAY_OPENCL_FILTER) += vf_overlay_opencl.o > > opencl.o > > Now we have the opencl_program filter and the overlay_opencl filter. > I vote for consistent naming in either direction. I think the convention is vf_<name>_opencl, and vf_opencl_program is an "exception" because it's not a "program" filter implemented with OpenCL, but just an "OpenCL program" filter. _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
