On 12/04/2017 13:53, Martin Storsjö wrote: > This allows testing and benchmarking use of the col_limit parameter > in the idct implementations. > --- > I can't say I really understand the logic for setting the col_limit > parameter based on the range on where non-zero coefficients are set, > but this set up at least works with the reference C version of the > idct. (I.e., it gives the same result both if passing the real > col_limit value or block_size, i.e. it doesn't miss anything.) > --- > tests/checkasm/hevc_idct.c | 46 > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------- > 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) >
Probably fine. _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
