On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 1:32 PM, wm4 <nfx...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 20:27:28 +0300
> Rémi Denis-Courmont <r...@remlab.net> wrote:
>
>> Le maanantaina 24. huhtikuuta 2017, 17.37.00 EEST wm4 a écrit :
>> > I propose that we remove non-native endian pixfmt variations. Pixel
>> > data would always be in native endianness (for example little endian on
>> > a little endian system). All LE/BE formats would be dropped, and only
>> > those without suffix would be left (mostly this implies moving the
>> > current native-endian aliases to the proper pixfmt enum).
>>
>> I violently agree.
>>
>> > Some formats (mostly simply raw formats) actually store data in a
>> > specific endianness - decoders and encoders would need to byte-swap
>> > them.
>>
>> Yes.
>>
>> I also advocate eliminating palette-based formats likewise.
>
> We probably can't get rid of AV_PIX_FMT_PAL8 (or can we?), but we can
> definitely drop AV_PIX_FMT_FLAG_PSEUDOPAL (it's complete nonsense).

on behalf of two coworkers of mine: YES PLEASE
-- 
Vittorio
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
libav-devel@libav.org
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel

Reply via email to