On Fri, 18 Aug 2017 15:40:32 +0300 (EEST)
Martin Storsjö <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Fri, 18 Aug 2017, Anton Khirnov wrote:
> 
> > Quoting wm4 (2017-08-17 15:01:44)  
> >> Main use-case is proxying avio through a foreign I/O layer and a custom
> >> AVIO context, without losing latency and performance characteristics.
> >> ---
> >>  doc/APIchanges              | 3 +++
> >>  libavformat/avio.h          | 9 +++++++++
> >>  libavformat/avio_internal.h | 8 --------
> >>  libavformat/aviobuf.c       | 2 +-
> >>  libavformat/rawdec.c        | 2 +-
> >>  libavformat/rtsp.c          | 2 +-
> >>  libavformat/version.h       | 2 +-
> >>  7 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >> 
> >> diff --git a/doc/APIchanges b/doc/APIchanges
> >> index 463247f48e..ed90be890d 100644
> >> --- a/doc/APIchanges
> >> +++ b/doc/APIchanges
> >> @@ -13,6 +13,9 @@ libavutil:     2017-03-23
> >>
> >>  API changes, most recent first:
> >> 
> >> +2016-xx-xx - xxxxxxx - lavf 58.1.0 - avio.h
> >> +  Add avio_read_partial().
> >> +
> >>  2017-xx-xx - xxxxxxx - lavu 56.4.0 - imgutils.h
> >>    Add av_image_fill_black().
> >> 
> >> diff --git a/libavformat/avio.h b/libavformat/avio.h
> >> index e65135ed99..f604c4ad41 100644
> >> --- a/libavformat/avio.h
> >> +++ b/libavformat/avio.h
> >> @@ -331,6 +331,15 @@ void avio_flush(AVIOContext *s);
> >>   */
> >>  int avio_read(AVIOContext *s, unsigned char *buf, int size);
> >> 
> >> +/**
> >> + * Read size bytes from AVIOContext into buf. Unlike avio_read(), this is 
> >> allowed
> >> + * to read fewer bytes than requested. The missing bytes can be read in 
> >> the next
> >> + * call. This always tries to read at least 1 byte.
> >> + * Useful to reduce latency in certain cases.
> >> + * @return number of bytes read or AVERROR
> >> + */
> >> +int avio_read_partial(AVIOContext *s, unsigned char *buf, int size);  
> >
> > Maybe this would be a good opportunity to make this size_t  
> 
> Hmm, not sure how much point there is in that, since all of the 
> intermediate api (the avio callbacks) still are in int. So I'm wondering 
> if it's better to change things gradually with a large inconsistency 
> internally in the avio layer, or just switch it all at once (if needed).

I'd vote the latter.
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel

Reply via email to