On Sun, Feb 04, 2018 at 02:32:48PM +0000, Mark Thompson wrote:
> On 03/02/18 17:23, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 02:59:02PM +0000, Mironov, Mikhail wrote:
> >>> On 1/3/2018 7:53 PM, Sean McGovern wrote:
> >>>> 2 things:
> >>>> - does this actually depend on dlopen directly, or should it be libdl,
> >>>> like the entries below it?
> >>> If this is Windows only as the doxy states, then LoadLibrary should be the
> >>> only dep. But otherwise you're right, it should be libdl and not dlopen.
> >> We plan to add Linux support so eventually libdl will be needed. For now I
> >> am OK with either solution.
> > If this is Windows-only (for now at least), then there is no need for all
> > the
> > ifdeffery. We can add complexity if and when it is needed, no need to
> > clutter
> > the code for an uncertain and possibly distant future.
> On 04/02/18 14:08, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> > Do we have coverage for this on FATE?
> This is why the vestigial libdl etc. support is useful - given the headers on
> Linux, it's just another external library you can build anywhere.
OK, I'll look into adding it to my external libs FATE/Oracle instances.
libav-devel mailing list