I've confirmed this does seem to be a regression. https://dl.dropbox.com/u/28441949/0.8.3.results.zip https://dl.dropbox.com/u/28441949/0.11.1.results.zip
I ran the same code with the same video on ffmpeg 0.8.3 and 0.11.1 and you can see the thumbnails generated are not the same. #281 in 0.11.1 lines up with #221 in 0.8.3. On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Simon Daniels <[email protected]>wrote: > Interesting. There was a difference of 30 between the frames that > ffmpeg.exe output and the result of ->nb_frames. > > Sure enough, ffmpeg.exe with -vsync 0 output 480 frames instead of 510. So > now how do I get my code's output to match ffmpeg.exe's output? (and > hopefully skip frames in the process) > > > > > On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 12:15 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Simon Daniels <simondaniels23@...> writes: >> >> > frame= 1 fps=0.1 q=6.4 Lq=24.8 size= 0kB time=00:00:00.03 >> > bitrate= 0.0kbits/s dup=30 drop=0 >> >> I do not completely understand the output (may be a Windows problem), >> but I suspect if you get "dup=30" away, you should be "lined up". >> Try -vsync 0 or add -r 25 (or similar) as an output option. >> >> Carl Eugen >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Libav-user mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-user >> > >
_______________________________________________ Libav-user mailing list [email protected] http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-user
