>>>> License: nonfree and unredistributable > (If you believe something is unclear about > above message and that it does not explain > that you may not legally distribute the > resulting binary, please tell us!)
I imagine I missed it because it gets buried in the metric ton of compilation output (warnings etc) that results from building FFmpeg with GCC. > Then please remove the option --enable-nonfree > from your configure line. Already done. > It is a copyright violation to distribute > FFmpeg binaries that were built with this > option. Fortunately for me this version of the app isn't yet published. The current market version relies on very buggy platform support to play video, which is a different world of hurt but at least it's legally clear. Thanks for the legal advice, I guess. On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 11:28 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos <[email protected]> wrote: > Reuben Scratton <reuben.scratton@...> writes: > > >>> License: nonfree and unredistributable > > (If you believe something is unclear about > above message and that it does not explain > that you may not legally distribute the > resulting binary, please tell us!) > > >> But this is certainly not the configure line you > >> use for the version that your Android users > >> tested and protested performance-wise or am I > >> wrong? > > > > You're not wrong, this is indeed the version > > being protested performance-wise. > > Then please remove the option --enable-nonfree > from your configure line. > It is a copyright violation to distribute > FFmpeg binaries that were built with this > option. > > Carl Eugen > > _______________________________________________ > Libav-user mailing list > [email protected] > http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-user >
_______________________________________________ Libav-user mailing list [email protected] http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-user
