That is a far cry from "mostly useless" as Paul claims. I guess I wasn't as ignorant in my original assumption of the meaning of the term "experimental" as was suggested.
Sent from my iPhone On Apr 30, 2013, at 3:24 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos <[email protected]> wrote: > Brad O'Hearne <brado@...> writes: > >> "This codec is not to be used for production, >> as it will not continue to be developed or supported." > > Neither is true as far as I can tell. > (Again, I am not a native speaker, so I may > misunderstand you sentence, but the aac encoder > is neither less nor more supported than any > other encoder, and will certainly see more > development than at least most other encoders > in the future.) > > Carl Eugen > > _______________________________________________ > Libav-user mailing list > [email protected] > http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-user _______________________________________________ Libav-user mailing list [email protected] http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-user
