On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 10:46:38AM +0200, jujulj wrote: > On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 11:21 PM, Michael Niedermayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > On Fri, Apr 04, 2008 at 02:09:00PM +0200, jujulj wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 1:23 PM, Michel Bardiaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Please dont top-post; trim old sigs and similar cruft when replying; > > and > > > > preferrably post complete code that one can compile and try without > > a > > > > lot of effort. > > > > > > > > > > ok, sorry. Here's a clean post. > > > > > > My problem: I'm getting twice as many decoded values as expected, and > > > 0s in the second half of every decoded frame... > > > My easily compilable and triable code is attached. It creates > > > /tmp/decoded_samples.dat and printf the number of decoded values. > > [...] > > > //output buffer > > > int16_t *output_buf; > > > output_buf= new int16_t[(AVCODEC_MAX_AUDIO_FRAME_SIZE * 3)/2]; > > [...] > > > bytesDecoded = avcodec_decode_audio2(pAudioCodecCtx, > > output_buf, &numAudioBytes, pIn , audioBytesRemaining); > > [...] > > > for(int j=0;j<numAudioBytes;j++) > > > > > fprintf(outfile,"%d\n",output_buf[j]); > > > > so half of the int16_t bytes are 0? [...] > > Yes,
Ohh this is bad, i suggest you learn C. Especially the difference between bytes and int16_t. :) [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB The greatest way to live with honor in this world is to be what we pretend to be. -- Socrates
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ libav-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/libav-user
