Hi Keean,
Keean Schupke wrote:
[...]
> Okay, I was thinking that each clip would be sequenced into ffserver
> using ffmpeg like:
>
> ffmpeg -i video1.avi http://localhost:8090/feed1.ffm
> ffmpeg -i video2.avi http://localhost:8090/feed1.ffm
> ffmpeg -i video3.avi http://localhost:8090/feed1.ffm
[...]
> These features would seem of general benefit to ffserver. Why would
> you not want them?
I am not saying that these features are useless or that I do not like
them; I was simply suggesting that all the "video editing" operations
can be performed in the program which feeds ffserver, instead of
performing them in ffserver (note that this program generally runs on
the same machine in which ffserver is running, and feeds it via the
network loopback interface, so there is no risk that ffserver is not
properly feeded).
I think this is the simplest (and maybe cleaner) solution: ffserver
only cares about streaming, and some other program performs the video
editing, transcoding, etc... and feeds ffserver.
Of course, feel free to prove that I am wrong ;-)
Luca
_______________________________________________
libav-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/libav-user
