Thanks for the feedback! @Janne: Correct, the ref s/w is *not* LGPL. However, it is a very liberal license, so we may be able to use it.
On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 1:00 PM, Janne Grunau <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 11:12:54AM -0800, Stew Paddaso wrote: >> >> We want to use the LGPL version of FFmpeg in a commercial product, but >> we also want FAAC support. Looking at the FAAC license (and the MPEG-4 >> ref s/w license... since FAAC is an LGPL modification of the ref s/w), >> it looks like we may get clearance from "legal" to use libfaac also. > > You have to to satisfy both licenses simultaneously. AFAIK the MPEG-4 ref > s/w license is not lgpl compatible bit I'm not a laywer. > > Janne > _______________________________________________ > libav-user mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/libav-user > _______________________________________________ libav-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/libav-user
