On Fri, 22.08.08 14:51, Brian Cameron ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: >> Hehe. On request of Glynn Foster I sent mail to the osol mailing list >> a while back, regarding PA and Solaris. It didn't exactly get a >> positive response. The Solaris people think I am retarded or something >> and PA is the totally obsoleted by OSS4 and they wondered why RH might >> pay me for this. Good for them! > > Not really true. I think Sun would consider integrating PulseAudio. > However, we would need to have a better understanding of what value it > adds when used with OSSv4. That's not very clear to me. I'd think the > OpenSolaris developer community will let us know if someone comes up > with a useful reason why it would add value.
I guess audio is not exactly a priority for Solaris users. Waiting for die-hard Unixers to consider something for device access that is not a Unix-style device file might be asking too much. ;-) Again, it's not my job to educate Sun people about PA. The docs are out there, all relevant distros in the Linux community got the message. The initiative to find out why they did that must come from Sun/Solaris, not from me. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering Red Hat, Inc. lennart [at] poettering [dot] net ICQ# 11060553 http://0pointer.net/lennart/ GnuPG 0x1A015CC4 _______________________________________________ libcanberra-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://tango.0pointer.de/mailman/listinfo/libcanberra-discuss
