Hi,

Is it just me or is is volatile cache control pointless in the pulse
backend?

I try using it but never see any caches saved. Is this simply because PA
doesn't have a cache eviction system and thus volatile caching with PA
backend == no caching? Certainly the GTK module uses cache control of
permanent so I'd expect that under most circumstances that it would
prefer to be volatile if it were available.

If so should support for this be added to PA and then implemented in LC?

Col

-- 

Colin Guthrie
gmane(at)colin.guthr.ie
http://colin.guthr.ie/

Day Job:
  Tribalogic Limited [http://www.tribalogic.net/]
Open Source:
  Mageia Contributor [http://www.mageia.org/]
  PulseAudio Hacker [http://www.pulseaudio.org/]
  Trac Hacker [http://trac.edgewall.org/]

_______________________________________________
libcanberra-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://tango.0pointer.de/mailman/listinfo/libcanberra-discuss

Reply via email to