Hi,
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
On Friday 09 March 2007, Peter Creath wrote:
My only concern is if people have to search and install a bunch of
other packages just to build libcdio. That's a fast way to get people
to toss libcdio without giving it a second look. I almost didn't
bother with it at all for this reason.
If I understood it right, it's a conflict between built-in getopt
and system-wide getopt.
If cdio contains a getopt() implementation anyway, why not rename it to
cdio_getopt() and use this exclusively? This means less bloat and things
will work like they do now.
Just my $0.02
Burkhard
_______________________________________________
Libcdio-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libcdio-devel
