Robert William Fuller wrote:
Robert William Fuller wrote:
Peter Creath wrote:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 11:33 PM, Robert William Fuller
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
<snip>
I saw a flow diagram for this somewhere that I think answers that
question. I just looked for it for about 20 minutes and did NOT find
it. Very frustrating. The fact that some drives "cook" the "raw" P-W
makes me suspicious about the sync being any better, but it might be
:-) I wish I could find that diagram. If I don't turn it up, I'll
have to decode P-W from a number of drives to see if I can figure that
out.
I found the diagram. It's in MMC-3 (r10g,) section 5.17.1, page 163,
Figure 42. I think you are right. I think the "raw" P-W is more likely
to be "in sync" although it is still true that there will be the pesky
read sample offset.
This is another related diagram:
http://club.cdfreaks.com/attachments/f52/26118d1109458617-offsets-handling-syncing-audio-data-vs-q-channel-efm.jpg
