On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 1:33 PM, R. Bernstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Again, if anyone is motivated enough to change the lingo in
> Makefile.am, make the change or send a patch. Otherwise we live with
> what we've got which is not harmful, just bloat.

I was going to tackle this, but now I'm puzzled:  the tarball for 0.80
had these m4 files in it at the top level (along with a config.rpath),
but CVS didn't.  How did that happen?

Running a "make distclean" out of CVS didn't produce them either.


Reply via email to