Hi, Rocky Bernstein wrote: > The definition of bool in types.h comes from an era decades ago when > stdbool.h wasn't so std or rather didn't exist.
I found it on my system only as /usr/include/c++/4.9/tr1/stdbool.h which only does #include <tr1/cstdbool> which exists as /usr/include/c++/4.9/tr1/cstdbool It includes the really ugly file #include <bits/c++config.h> and then again does #if _GLIBCXX_HAVE_STDBOOL_H #include <stdbool.h> #endif Which gives my brain a logical endless loop. > In this day and age though, I think we should just drop the bool definition > in types.h. That will probably break the ABI, but I think I'm okay with > that. Well, if the ABI is doomed, then i shall hurry to develop the "pragmatic" multi-extent branch, as sketched out with Pete. But i still have one change in statv2 on the plan: Detecting files which are not suitable for the "pragmatic" concept. :)) Have a nice day :) Thomas
