On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 6:27 PM, Stephen Kell <[email protected]> wrote:
> > The test currently is that if there are no data tracks we consider cd > audio. > > What would > > be a better test? If there is only one data track after all of the audio > > tracks? > > I'd say if there are *any* audio tracks, it's worth doing a CDDB lookup. > Sometimes the order is reversed, e.g. game CDs that have a red-book > audio soundtrack after the track with the game data. Sometimes there > are even multiple data tracks (e.g. one for Mac, one for Windows). > Ok. It sounds like you've got a good idea of what you'd expect to see. If this is correct, then probably it would be best for you to work something that meets your expectations. If there's a question or a coding problem you have, I can probably help out. > > > What would be very helpful is to remaster this CD to make it not > proprietary > > so we > > have a sample test to work with. For example you could burn this to an > image > > and then > > make the wav part be 1 second of silence. If the data part has > copyrighted > > text, change the text. > > We want to keep the *structure* of the CD image to be about the same. > The > > content can be totally different. > > Cool -- should be no trouble. I'll post back in a couple of days. I can > probably provide a few more test cases too, for other kinds of > data/audio hybrid. > Great! Rather than post the disc images to the mailing l'd suggest https://savannah.gnu.org/patch/?group=libcdio instead. Another possibility is to send the images directly to me. > > Thanks! No - thank you! > > Stephen >
_______________________________________________ Libcdio-help mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libcdio-help
