Dhaval Giani wrote: > On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 09:08:04AM -0700, Paul Menage wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 2:09 AM, Dhaval Giani <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> I am not sure if this is a good idea. For libcgroup, we would then be >>> adding a special case for just cpuset. I would rather that we allow it >>> either for all the subsystems or none of them. >>> >> libcgroup shouldn't be using the noprefix option. Its only intentded >> use is to allow the legacy "cpuset" filesystem type to be mounted and >> to see the same fileset as it had before the cgroups transition. >> > > It does not. But if some user is using that option, we need to be in a > position to handle it. > > I am quite happy not supporting the noprefix option in the library if it > is fine. >
I don't think we need to support noprefix in libcgroup. Even if we decide to support noprefix in the lib, it shouldn't be harder to handle noprefix+cpuset only than handle noprefix+any combination of subsystems. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ OpenSolaris 2009.06 is a cutting edge operating system for enterprises looking to deploy the next generation of Solaris that includes the latest innovations from Sun and the OpenSource community. Download a copy and enjoy capabilities such as Networking, Storage and Virtualization. Go to: http://p.sf.net/sfu/opensolaris-get _______________________________________________ Libcg-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libcg-devel
