> I saw that part, from the kernel design perspective root should 100%
> of the resources, so to be honest root levels should not matter.
> Having said that I don't know what the rt controller does. So for
> memory at-least root levels don't matter.
>

Well, in the case of rt-cgroups, it actually is pretty important. (Ok,
not so much in the current implementation, but once we have deadline
schedulnig in, it will be pretty important). The period decides how
quickly your bandwidth will get refreshed, and so define your
latency/responsiveness. That is an important tunable. Now, let's say I
want to keep the same amouut of bandwidth, but a shorter period. In
this case, first I must reduce the budget (the runtime) and then
reduce the period. OTOH, when I want to increase the period, then I
have to do it in the opposite order. Period first, followed by the
budget.

Now, in this case dependency ordering matters. If we do not reset it
completely, then the configuration files cannot be carefully written
to take care of the dependency ordering. So, we are stuck with this.

Thanks!
Dhaval

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint
What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone?
Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first
_______________________________________________
Libcg-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libcg-devel

Reply via email to