On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 9:01 PM, Paul Menage <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 11:38 AM, Lennart Poettering > <[email protected]> wrote: >> agents for that, and simply forward this to the D-Bus system bus, but my >> stomach revolts every time I get reminded that each time a service exits >> we spawn a little agent process just for that. >> > > Agreed. I don't like release_agent much either. As I said, it was just > for cpusets backwards-compatibility. (Cgroups originally descended > from cpusets in a backward-compatible way. Although in hindsight this > was probably not the best long-term plan, it seemed the only way to > get the system adopted at the time). >
ok, so is there some way one can extend this functionality at a per cgroup level? or it will completely break cpusets? (heh, the only thing I see is that cpuset compatibility is breaking a lot of other cool stuff cgroups otherwise has ;-) ) Dhaval ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Make an app they can't live without Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Libcg-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libcg-devel
