On 12/07/2010 09:35 PM, Dhaval Giani wrote: > On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 5:02 PM, Jan Safranek<[email protected]> wrote: >>> Yes, I am in the process of release v0.37. I've tagged the release, >>> but I am unable to build rpms (I am currently on Ubuntu). Could you >>> please double check if rpmbuild -ta<...> works. I'll go ahead and >>> upload the tarball after that. >> >> I see your commit 38228b61c0f29f513f618241b24de3c1dc8ee0f6 with comment >> "Release v0.37", but I don't see any tag with 0.37 and the commit is >> empty (i.e. no changed code)... >> >> rpmbuild -ta works as expected on my Fedora 14, but builds >> libcgroup-0.37.rc1, please do not forget to remove the rc1 :). >> > Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files > /home/dhaval/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/libcgroup-0.37-1.fc14.x86_64 > Wrote: /home/dhaval/rpmbuild/SRPMS/libcgroup-0.37-1.fc14.src.rpm > Wrote: /home/dhaval/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/libcgroup-0.37-1.fc14.x86_64.rpm > Wrote: /home/dhaval/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/libcgroup-pam-0.37-1.fc14.x86_64.rpm > Wrote: > /home/dhaval/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/libcgroup-devel-0.37-1.fc14.x86_64.rpm > Wrote: > /home/dhaval/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/libcgroup-debuginfo-0.37-1.fc14.x86_64.rpm > > I don't see that happening here. Could you confirm once more? We can > upload the tarballs soon after.
That's expected output. Current git head looks good to me, thanks a lot! Jan ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ What happens now with your Lotus Notes apps - do you make another costly upgrade, or settle for being marooned without product support? Time to move off Lotus Notes and onto the cloud with Force.com, apps are easier to build, use, and manage than apps on traditional platforms. Sign up for the Lotus Notes Migration Kit to learn more. http://p.sf.net/sfu/salesforce-d2d _______________________________________________ Libcg-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libcg-devel
