On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 4:23 AM, Kevin Constantine <kevin.constant...@disneyanimation.com> wrote: > This is more a curiosity thing. Is there a reason that cpuset.mems and > cpuset.cpus aren't set to the value of their parent when a new cgroups > is created with the cpuset subsystem? > > It seems like these two values are unique in needing to be set before > the cgroup is usable. I think all other values are just automatically > populated with the parent value. >
Hi, Kevin This has been discussed quite a bit on lkml as well. We continue with that behaviour (IIRC) for backward compatibility reasons. In libcgroup we have a cgroup_create_cgroup_from_parent(), but I am not sure if it has been rigorously tested Balbir ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2 _______________________________________________ Libcg-devel mailing list Libcg-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libcg-devel
