On 2013/10/16 10:21, Dhaval Giani wrote: > Hi! > > I am going to say no to this solution. I think ordering by guessing is > just going to lead us to trouble. Instead, we probably want to have > some sort of ordering set first. > > There are two ways to get this done, > > 1. Have the ordering hardcoded into the code > 2. Have (yet another) configuration file which has how individual > subsystems and their files should be ordered. > > Both have their issues. The first solution really limits us to a few > subsystems we care about. The second one adds another user filled file > (which honestly is ugly),and needs more parsing, but is a lot more > powerful. > > I am willing to accept 1. for the time being, if you promise to get 2 > done :-). (Unless you have a better idea) > > Thanks! > Dhaval > > Hi Dhaval, I had send the third version patch, can that satisfy what you mentioned in 1?
Thanks! Weng Meiling ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ October Webinars: Code for Performance Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance. Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60135031&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Libcg-devel mailing list Libcg-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libcg-devel
