Hello Tom, I see your efforts around covering libcgroup with tests, I assume from earlier conversations it is because of adding support for cgroup v2.
>From my experience, usage of libcgroup is often in direct conflict with systemd maintaining the hierarchy. I.e. for users it is more convenient to go through systemd provided APIs currently or they should be confined to a hierarchy given up by systemd (e.g. delegated subtree). I consider libcgroup operating on lower level than systemd's abstractions, i.e. it'd need some extra work to hide the v1 vs v2 differences from its users or the users should be aware of the differences anyway. I'm wrapping my head around what would v2 support bring and how it combines with the systemd hierarchy. Hence I'd like to ask (I'm interested in opinions from anyone one the list): - What is the vision/extent of the proposed changes? - What are intended use cases of such an extension? Thanks, Michal _______________________________________________ Libcg-devel mailing list Libcg-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libcg-devel
