On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 01:23:26PM -0700, Tom Hromatka <tom.hroma...@oracle.com> wrote: > Good find. I had the exact same thought, but I was torn on whether > I should fix it or not. Adding the logic to ensure all the settings > completely matched got kind of ugly - and required a lot more lines of > code. I'll revisit it and see if I can come up with something more > graceful, but I'm struggling to find the right balance between verifying > correctness and the unwieldiness of the tests. Thoughts? IMO, clean C with its crude data structures isn't a good fit for such quick text sets checks. A simple idea would be to sort k-v entries (both the expects and actual) by the key, concatenate as strings and compare the strings.
Since the testing framework already mandates C++, some STL containers may ease that if you decide to use them. Michal _______________________________________________ Libcg-devel mailing list Libcg-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libcg-devel
