On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 01:39:56PM -0800, Paul Querna wrote: > From an ASF legal/policy side, I think we are currently passing the > RAT tests.
I have no clue what this means. Could any of the code changes we discussing affect this, or is this more of an organisational status? > potential blockers: > - Removal of Zope Interfaces. People talked about it, but no code > was committed. I don't feel strongly about this at all. IIRC, the primary argument was that it might be difficult for people to fulfill this dependency. I question the validity of this concern: * Looking at http://download.zope.org/distribution/ it seems clear that the Zope interface code is distributed separately, and is even available as an egg, so you don't have to mess around with a full Zope stack just to get to the interface code. * Debian, Ubuntu, and Fedora all provide this as a package. * Have we actually have anyone complain about this, or are we just assuming that this is difficult for people? Sorry about not chiming in on this sooner. I was otherwise engaged when the discussion went on last time. :) > Thoughts from the crowd? I'm working on this CLI tool[1] for libcloud, but I'm not completely sure we want it included in libcloud, since it doesn't expose all of libcloud's functionality (anything provider specific is not exposed at all at the moment). [1]: https://launchpad.net/~soren/libcloud/cloudctl -- Soren Hansen | Lead virtualisation engineer | Ubuntu Server Team Canonical Ltd. | http://www.ubuntu.com/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
