Markus Hoenicka writes: > Hi all, > > in our ongoing uphill struggle to finally ship 0.9.0 I've made a few > modifications to how docs are handled by the build system. This was > triggered by a request of Debian and Ubuntu packagers who prefer to > install the docs separately instead of by default. The following > changes were implemented: >
Sorry but I've scrapped all this again. With a little help from the Automake AT gnu.org mailing list I've implemented a simpler and more standards-compliant solution. This works as follows: - the --disable-docs configure switch is back again - make install installs everything, just as before - make install-exec installs the library, the headers and the .pc file - make install-data installs the docs To give it a whirl, either pull the current cvs revision, or use this tarball: http://libdbi.sourceforge.net/downloads/libdbi-0.9.0-pre4.tar.gz Once again, if you just want to test the installation stuff without overwriting your current libdbi installation, use something like: make DESTDIR=$HOME/scrap install-data BTW the current cvs revision of libdbi-drivers now can be installed in the same way, which should make life easier for those package maintainers who roll separate doc packages. regards, Markus -- Markus Hoenicka http://www.mhoenicka.de AQ score 38 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances and start using them to simplify application deployment and accelerate your shift to cloud computing. http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev _______________________________________________ libdbi-devel mailing list libdbi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libdbi-devel
