jpac...@redhat.com writes: > Up until now, I've used version automake-1.12.5 with timestamp > 2012-09-25. But it's possible (and I'd rather prefer it) to use a newer > one (IMHO a half-year old one should be enough stable). >
Hi, I just checked my local copies. The last release was built from the CVS sources which still have the automake 1.11 files. My current git local copy uses automake 1.14, so if I should package a new release anytime soon it would have automake files newer than what you asked for. In any case, what do you think about adding "--force-missing" to the automake call in ./autogen.sh to facilitate easier updating to newer automake releases? regards, Markus -- Markus Hoenicka http://www.mhoenicka.de AQ score 38 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services. Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For Critical Workloads, Development Environments & Everything In Between. Get a Quote or Start a Free Trial Today. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=119420431&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ libdbi-devel mailing list libdbi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libdbi-devel
