On 23-Mar-09, at 4:47 AM, Markus Hoenicka wrote: > Hi all, > > I've received a request to support in-memory databases in the SQLite3 > driver. While this is fairly easy to implement, it would be a > sqlite3-specific feature. I've seen that recent MySQL versions provide > in-memory *tables* which cannot easily be supported by libdbi, unless > we provide libdbi functions for creating tables. The PostgreSQL folks > claim that their databases reside in memory anyway, if the available > RAM permits and if the server is configured appropriately. How do > other database engines handle this? Is it worth pondering a libdbi > interface to in-memory databases?
As you already researched, MySQL 'memory tables' and PostgreSQL's caching don't need anything special at the libdbi level. --Toby > > regards, > Markus > > -- > Markus Hoenicka > markus.hoeni...@cats.de > (Spam-protected email: replace the quadrupeds with "mhoenicka") > http://www.mhoenicka.de > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > -------- > Apps built with the Adobe(R) Flex(R) framework and Flex Builder(TM) > are > powering Web 2.0 with engaging, cross-platform capabilities. > Quickly and > easily build your RIAs with Flex Builder, the Eclipse(TM)based > development > software that enables intelligent coding and step-through debugging. > Download the free 60 day trial. http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-adobe-com > _______________________________________________ > Libdbi-drivers-devel mailing list > Libdbi-drivers-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libdbi-drivers-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Libdbi-drivers-devel mailing list Libdbi-drivers-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libdbi-drivers-devel
