pichon julien <julienpich...@gmail.com> was heard to say: > It seems a good thing to check first at the top level (direct entry > point in libdbi) arguments > given to the function before going down into the driver. But it > shouldn't prevent > developers to make argument checking into the drivers.
No, certainly not. I didn't mean to make anyone think I'm opposed to making the drivers more foolproof. I was just concerned about those drivers which are not being actively maintained at this time. They will benefit from adding checks to the library too. If we can make sure that driver functions like dbd_conn_query() are never called without an open connection, we can fix your original problem in one place once and for all, instead of in each existing (and possibly any new) driver. I was basically arguing for lowering everyone's maintenance burden, not against your suggested patch. regards, Markus -- Markus Hoenicka http://www.mhoenicka.de AQ score 38 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Centralized Desktop Delivery: Dell and VMware Reference Architecture Simplifying enterprise desktop deployment and management using Dell EqualLogic storage and VMware View: A highly scalable, end-to-end client virtualization framework. Read more! http://p.sf.net/sfu/dell-eql-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Libdbi-drivers-devel mailing list Libdbi-drivers-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libdbi-drivers-devel
