> > What is the advantage of using bind* instead of get* here? > > As a side note, your code is close to an alternative interface which > we've discussed in the past. Instead of using strongly typed return > values, the alternative interface would allow to retrieve data as a > string or an integer, regardless of the storage type. For obvious > reasons, the results would not always be meaningful, but at least > you'd be able to retrieve a string representation of each and every > value. Your request indicates that such an interface would be a useful > addition. Would you be interested to integrate such an interface into > libdbi? I'd be happy to help.
Yes, I have interest! This is not so dificult, I think. Can you explain your idea? I is very interesting. Maybe two functions: char *dbi_get_value(dbi_result *result, int row_number, unsigned int column_number); int dbi_bind_value(dbi_result *result, int row_number, unsigned int column_number, char *value); The different is: dbi_get_value not free memory and dbi_bind_value free memory. Thanks -- ----------------------------------------------------------- João Henrique Freitas - joaohf_at_gmail.com Campinas-SP-Brasil BSD051283 LPI 1 http://joaohf.pbwiki.com http://www.livejournal.com/users/joaohf/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ libdbi-users mailing list libdbi-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libdbi-users
