The one-sided, incendiary and inaccurate terminology of the blog posting quoted
by Mallory Knodel creates the impression that, were it not for the actions of
the overbearing Israelis, Palestinians would otherwise enjoy full computer and
Internet freedom. Of course, this is far from the truth. Rather, as reported by
many including Thomas Friedman in his 7 May 2012 New York Times editorial
(http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/07/world/middleeast/arab-spring-stirs-palestinian-journalists-to-test-limits.html),
it is the Palestinian Authority which has suppressed online speech, arrested
bloggers and journalists for governmental criticism, and sought to block entire
Web sites, only to be foiled in the last effort because (as Friedman says the
now-resigned Palestinian Authority communications minister Mashour Abudaka
stated) "with Israeli Internet providers covering much of the West Bank, it is
impossible to block any site completely, 'so why give us the image of a
dictatorship?'" That is, Palestinians must utilize Israeli ISPs because they,
unlike their Palestinian counterparts, are not being blocked in the name of
suppression.
It is incumbent upon all of us that, before we accept any side's version of
events such as the alleged seizure of the BlockTheWall computers reported in
this blog, we seek out additional, empirical sources to get a full (or at least
better) understanding of what happened. This is as true today as it was for the
various actions chronicled by Bruce Sterling in The Hacker Crackdown decades
ago, and those who are subject to governmental action may be just as likely to
skew reporting for their own purposes as governments themselves. {Jonathan}
-------------------
Prof. Jonathan I. Ezor
Assistant Professor of Law
Director, Institute for Business, Law and Technology (IBLT)
Touro Law Center
225 Eastview Drive, Central Islip, NY 11722
Direct: 631-761-7119
e-mail: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; PGP key 0xFBA73A9E
Skype: jonathanezor Twitter: profjonathan
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mallory Knodel
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2012 10:46 AM
To: Liberation Technologies
Subject: [liberationtech] Computer seizure in the West Bank
I believe these actions, such as those by the FBI on the May First and Riseup
server, are indicative of the power of online networks for social change. The
two situations are quite different in that escalation of this attack on
Palestinian civil society is a very real possibility without some international
outcry. Some are suspecting that this is related to the current hunger strike
of thousands of Palestinian prisoners.
<snip>
_______________________________________________
liberationtech mailing list
[email protected]
Should you need to change your subscription options, please go to:
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech
If you would like to receive a daily digest, click "yes" (once you click above)
next to "would you like to receive list mail batched in a daily digest?"
You will need the user name and password you receive from the list moderator in
monthly reminders. You may ask for a reminder here:
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech
Should you need immediate assistance, please contact the list moderator.
Please don't forget to follow us on http://twitter.com/#!/Liberationtech
