The first full report about Mission 4636 "Crowdsourcing and Crisis-affect Community" is now at: http://www.mission4636.org/report/ The page contains a link to the report which will be published in the Journal of Information Retrieval, a summary of findings/recommendations, and the comments from the Haitian community.
Mission 4636 was a predominantly Haitian initiative that I coordinated in the wake of the 2010 earthquake in Haiti. It was the first time that crowdsourcing (microtasking) had been used for humanitarian response and is still the largest deployment of its kind -- larger than the next 10 deployments combined. In summary, the report has the following findings: 1. The greatest volume, speed and accuracy in information processing was by Haitians and those working most closely with them. 2. Previous reports about Mission 4636 have incorrectly credited international organizations with the majority of the work, often inflating the 5% of data that went through the software of international not-for-profits to look like 100% of the initiative. 3. No new technologies played a significant role in Mission 4636, which is again contrary to most reports to date. 4. Crowdsourcing (microtasking) was an effective strategy to structure and translate information into reports that the responders among the US Military could act on. 5. The online chat was vital for information sharing, as no one person could know all the possible locations and translations, but someone among the collaborating volunteers often did. 6. Among social media platforms, Facebook was by far the most important, which is contrary to most research on social media for emergency management that has focused on Twitter. 7. Translation was the largest and most important information processing task, followed by categorization and then geolocation and structuring information about missing people. 8. The use of a public-facing ‘crisis map’ was opposed by the majority of people within Mission 4636 and exposed the identities of at-risk individuals. 9. The majority of volunteers came together through social media and strong social ties. 10. A quarter of all crowdsourced information processing was by paid workers within Haiti, who were one of the most vital workforces but have also been excluded from most other reports to date. 11. The most important connections to the country were through the volunteers themselves, with direct relationships to people managing the clinics, radio stations, and individual people that we were supporting. From the findings in the report, the following recommendations are made for organizations or individuals considering the use of crowdsourcing in response to future disasters: 1. Find and manage volunteers via strong social ties. 2. Maintain a ten-to-one local-to-international workforce. 3. Default to private data practices. 4. Publish in the language of the crisis-affected community. 5. Do not elicit information for which there is not the capacity to respond. 6. Do not elicit emergency response communications. 7. Use social media to encourage the centralization of information. 8. Establish partnerships with technology companies. 9. Avoid partnerships with media organizations and citizen journalists. 10. Integrate, don’t innovate or disrupt. 11. Employ people with close ties to the crisis-affected region. The majority of the report is an analysis of how the Mission 4636 volunteers and workers collaborated online to structure, filter and share information among people within Haiti and among the response community. The particular focus is on the diaspora, and the argument is that the diaspora were the key to new methods of information sharing during a crisis, not the technology they happened to be using. Having said that, subscribers to this list might be interested to know that among the small role played by international engineers, 90% of the management was by Stanford alums. Rob Munro -- www.robertmunro.com _______________________________________________ liberationtech mailing list [email protected] Should you need to change your subscription options, please go to: https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech If you would like to receive a daily digest, click "yes" (once you click above) next to "would you like to receive list mail batched in a daily digest?" You will need the user name and password you receive from the list moderator in monthly reminders. You may ask for a reminder here: https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech Should you need immediate assistance, please contact the list moderator. Please don't forget to follow us on http://twitter.com/#!/Liberationtech
