Dear all, I'm pleased to announce the publication of our study Social Media Censorship in Times of Political Unrest A Social Simulation Experiment with the UK Riots, in the Bulletin of Sociological Methodology, vol. 115, n. 1.
I attach the SAGE press release. At the end of the mail, a link to download the preprint version of the article, plus other relevant materials (code, video, etc.) Cheers, Antonio # # # Press Room « Press Release Contact (media enquiries only) Katie Baker PR Executive Phone: +44 0207 324 8719 [email protected] CENSORING SOCIAL MEDIA FANS FLAMES OF SOCIAL UNREST London, (July 02, 2012). Is social media censorship a means to quell a modern uprising? Some politicians and law enforcers during the political turbulence of 2011 thought so but recent research suggests that uncensored citizens experience less violence and longer periods of peace between outbursts than communities subject to censorship. These new findings appear in the Bulletin of Sociological Methodology, published by SAGE. A consensus is forming around Internet censorship in the wake of last years uprisings, extending from the Arab Spring to the UK, according to Antonio Casilli, associate professor in digital humanities at Telecom ParisTech, France and Paola Tubaro, senior lecturer in economic sociology at the University of Greenwich, UK. The authors used sophisticated computer modeling to find out if the assumptions that actors use of media such as Twitter fueled mob action through greater awareness were true. Ambiguously, current narratives among the European political establishment suggest social media can be either the tools of liberation (in developing countries) or threats to values of peace and freedom (in Western countries). The researchers used state-of-the-art agent-based modelling as a starting point. Political conflict is often described as cumulative, involving escalating conflict and sometimes ending with regime change. However, in reality, periods of relative stability punctuated with violent outbursts are more typical. Existing models include a variable called vision, an individual agents ability to scan his/her neighbourhood for signs of police officers and/or active protesters. Higher vision means greater awareness of ones surroundings and a larger range of possible actions. In Casilli and Tubaros computer simulation, censorship narrows down vision. It interrupts the flow of communication and decreases the ability of individuals to appreciate their environment. In this sense, censorship blinds social actors to their own context. The researchers found that all possible scenarios led to initial outbursts of violence but how the situation evolved was significantly influenced by government social media censorship. In a total censorship scenario, similar to the Egyptian riots, violence levels remained at a maximum. Stronger censorship led to an increase in the average level of endemic violence over time. According to the model, the no censorship situation at first appears bleak, with incessant, high-level violent outbursts that seem larger than in other scenarios. However, looking at average violence levels over time, the uncensored scenario still has the least aggression. Although agents protest, sometimes violently, they are able to return to relative calm for longer periods in-between. The decision to maintain peace is the choice of agents themselves, rather than due to police repression. This research offers an interesting methodological bridge that shows how rules operating at the micro or individual level can account for collective dynamics. This is particularly interesting at a time when research is trending into two camps, either using micro-motives (such as personality, culture, and morals) or macro-indicators (such as poverty and social stratification) as explanatory factors. In the absence of robust indicators as to the rebelliousness of a given society, the choice of not restricting social communication turns out to be a judicious one for avoiding the surrender of democratic values and freedom of expression for an illusory sense of security, say Casilli and Tubaro. # # # Social Media Censorship in Times of Political Unrest - A Social Simulation Experiment with the UK Riots by Antonio A. Casilli and Paola Tubaro, published July 02 2012 in Bulletin of Sociological Methodology BMS: Bulletin of Sociological Methodology/Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique is a quarterly peer-reviewed scientific journal edited by Karl van Meter specializing in all aspects of sociological methodology, and published in both English and French. Each volume of the BMS contains research articles, extensive book and article reviews, as well as documentation and information on different centres of sociology and important meetings throughout the world. # # # The article will be free to access for a limited time here: http://bms.sagepub.com/ To access the preprint version and other relevant material: http://www.bodyspacesociety.eu/2012/07/03/censorship-and-social-casilli-tubaro/ -- Antonio A. Casilli Associate Professor Telecom ParisTech Researcher Edgar Morin Centre, EHESS, Paris _______________________________________________ liberationtech mailing list [email protected] Should you need to change your subscription options, please go to: https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech If you would like to receive a daily digest, click "yes" (once you click above) next to "would you like to receive list mail batched in a daily digest?" You will need the user name and password you receive from the list moderator in monthly reminders. You may ask for a reminder here: https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech Should you need immediate assistance, please contact the list moderator. Please don't forget to follow us on http://twitter.com/#!/Liberationtech
