________________________________
 From: "[email protected]" 
<[email protected]>
To: [email protected] 


   1. Re: Independent UK Critic of NBC has Twitter account
      suspended after network complains 
  
All of this endless literalist parsing of whether you can or cannot find the 
NBC executive's
email easily through Google or not is losing sight of the bigger picture of why 
Twitter or any
social media platform would have a policy about not publicizing personal 
information -- *so 
as not to subject people to harassment*. THAT is the point. We all realize that 
if you
dredge through Google using tricks like trying variations of a person's name 
and their known
company domain, you can likely hit on their email, or it might show up in a 
conference list or
something in search and technically "be there". So what?

The point is, this email was *not* put on a public web page for the public to 
contact with complaints.
So it's not fair game. Adams is behaving like a common Anonymous script kiddie 
trying to incite
"The Internet" to flashmob this executive he believes responsible for a policy 
he doesn't like (remember
when Anonymous went after A&T executives like that when they thought AT&T was 
responsible for
taking 4chan down?)

That's just infantile. There's no need to harass somebody in person or even 
crash their mail server --
there are other avenues such as petition-writing or contacting the customer 
service public-facing
officials. 

There's that -- and then there's the entitlement-happy craze for instant 
on-demand Internet entertainment
without regard for how companies are supposed to make money. If NBC delays 
their airing of sports
until prime time, it's because they can sell ads better that way. What's the 
plan for them making money
off a live Internet stream? Most Internet ads don't make return as broadcast 
media ads -- it's a real problem
for how the media will survive. The notion that "loads of people show up at 
prime time anyway" or "only
some geeks know how to tunnel with VPN" just aren't valid arguments -- if 
people show up anyway, it 
may not be for long once the means of circumvention spread, and it isn't just a 
few people anyway. Indeed,
people like Adams think they can organize crowds by inciting Twitter.

Finally, there's the question of journalism. Since when does a journalist also 
get to consider himself a 
professional, and also incite flashmob protests on the Internet? Oh, since 
social media made it "ok"
_______________________________________________
liberationtech mailing list
[email protected]

Should you need to change your subscription options, please go to:

https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech

If you would like to receive a daily digest, click "yes" (once you click above) 
next to "would you like to receive list mail batched in a daily digest?"

You will need the user name and password you receive from the list moderator in 
monthly reminders. You may ask for a reminder here: 
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech

Should you need immediate assistance, please contact the list moderator.

Please don't forget to follow us on http://twitter.com/#!/Liberationtech

Reply via email to