Hi,
I like this list, I like the goals of it.
What has pained me in the past few days is that it's become clear
we've stopped talking about technologies and have moved onto "talking
about people who talk about technologies".
To me it has become eminently clear that:
a) Nadim's heart is in the right place and he's fully cognisant of a
good path forward for his software
b) Nobody will ever agree on the "best security for activists" because
no such single thing exists
c) Any article that appears in the mainstream media - or by any
non-subscriber - regards the software will be *out of date* - and to
merely mention it will be to dredge sewage up for re-examination as if
it were interesting or important.
So I beg fellow subscribers: please, let the matter drop. It's
boring, if not depressing, and this constant re-iteration of solved
questions smacks faintly of high school drama.
If you want to correct a posting in Wired, please either beat them up
in their comments section or else blog and tweet about them.
- alec
--
http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/aboutalecm
_______________________________________________
liberationtech mailing list
[email protected]
Should you need to change your subscription options, please go to:
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech
If you would like to receive a daily digest, click "yes" (once you click above)
next to "would you like to receive list mail batched in a daily digest?"
You will need the user name and password you receive from the list moderator in
monthly reminders. You may ask for a reminder here:
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech
Should you need immediate assistance, please contact the list moderator.
Please don't forget to follow us on http://twitter.com/#!/Liberationtech
