Alex Comninos <[email protected]> writes:
> On 7 November 2012 19:43, micah anderson <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Frankly, both of those reactions are embarassing. Are you unaware of the
>> most important tool that has been used for the most recent Spanish
>> mobilizations, not to mention many occupy groups around the world and
>> are letting the entire list know that?
>>
>
> I think the reactions, (though mine was in jest) were honest reflections on
> the inaccessibility of the discourse explaining the platform, as well as
> perhaps bad marketing of the platform.
I honestly think you didn't think before sending your reaction.
How can you possibly call 'lolwut' an '...honest reflection on the
inaccessibility of the discourse explaining the platform'?
> Its constructive criticism and I dont think you (or me and NK) should be
> embarrassed.
My understanding of constructive criticism doesn't match what you said
('lolwut'). Additionally, *constructive* criticism is never done "in
jest":
Constructive criticism is the process of offering valid and
well-reasoned opinions about the work of others, usually involving both
positive and negative comments, in a friendly manner rather than an
oppositional one. In collaborative work, this kind of criticism is often
a valuable tool in raising and maintaining performance standards.
seriously, troll elsewhere...
micah
1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constructive_criticism
--
Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password at:
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech
