The question about Skype's encryption has always seemed somewhat secondary
(though still important). The primary concern is who has the keys and who
do they share them with.

Answer: Skype, and whoever they feel like:
http://www.slate.com/blogs/future_tense/2012/11/09/skype_gave_data_on_a_teen_wikileaks_supporter_to_a_private_company_without.html


On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 8:17 AM, Yosem Companys <[email protected]>wrote:

> And we know that not to be true?
>
> #Activists: Pls read abt #Skype #security issues & potential alternatives
> http://urlite.de/secVoIP_wiki #secVOIP
>
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 10:22 PM, Brian Conley 
> <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I have recently seen Internews' new internet security guide.
>>
>>
>> http://www.internews.org/our-stories/project-updates/speaksafe-new-toolkit-safer-online-and-mobile-practices-media
>>
>> I wonder if anyone else on the list has seen it, or whether anyone knows
>> who authored it?
>>
>> I'd very much like to speak with them, as I'm quite concerned about a
>> number of items in the guide. The most noteworthy being that Internews
>> seems to have proclaimed Skype a completely acceptable technology, with no
>> evidence of its encryption being broken. I'm not sure this is false, since
>> backdoors don't need to break encryption in order to function, but, well...
>>
>> I will be reading through the guide at length in coming days and invite
>> Internews to contact me publicly or privately regarding the content.
>>
>> Look forward to comments from the list.
>>
>> Brian
>>
>> --
>> Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password at:
>> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech
>>
>
>
> --
> Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password at:
> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech
>
--
Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password at: 
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech

Reply via email to