Is there any benefit other than an aesthetic one? Centralizing all URLs under a single authority and then obfuscating them doesn't sound like a particularly great idea...
NK On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 9:17 AM, Eugen Leitl <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 03:14:35PM +0100, Alex Comninos wrote: > > data retention and privacy implications compared to for example is.gd > > or installing a URL shortner on Libtech's own servers? > > Earl shorteners are considered harmful. Don't use them. > > > implications of the .ly ccTLD being under Libyan jurisdiction? > > > > I would like to hear a little about these issues > -- > Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password at: > https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech >
-- Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password at: https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech
