-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Uncle Zzzen <[email protected]> writes:

> [Weighty argument compelling closer study.]

So unless and until the Mailvelope author(s) remedy this, support for
Mailvelope has to be muted.

However, comparison with Cryptocat is still unfitting because
Cryptocat does not even pretend to do store-and-forward authenticated
email using public key cryptography.  In fact, its author asserts [1]

   2. Cryptocat does not mean to compete with GPG, it means to replace *
   plaintext.*

[1] Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2012 18:14:33 -0700 Message-ID:
<caoz60qdzfadz35xjbwkad1vjtt3zzkbp-tw2ipq+sueuzsk...@mail.gmail.com>

- -- 


 -- StealthMonger <[email protected]>
    Long, random latency is part of the price of Internet anonymity.

   anonget: Is this anonymous browsing, or what?
   
http://groups.google.ws/group/alt.privacy.anon-server/msg/073f34abb668df33?dmode=source&output=gplain

   stealthmail: Hide whether you're doing email, or when, or with whom.
   mailto:[email protected]?subject=send%20index.html


Key: mailto:[email protected]?subject=send%20stealthmonger-key

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.9 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>

iEYEARECAAYFAlDI34wACgkQDkU5rhlDCl7RugCggOoq0oclCcZ/F2LPjUs3BIb5
AcUAnjeOtCVCLKzyqETqPvU1kFsgPnRk
=d7cd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password at: 
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech

Reply via email to